CO129-354 - Public Offices & Others - 1908 — Page 354

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

granting such leases was undertaken. They granted a 99-year lease of Marine Lot No. 2 Extension. Leases of Marine Lot No. 3 were also granted for 99 years.

This, however, did not satisfy the Governor, who contended that the ordinary rule of 75 years must apply with an option of one renewal for 99 years, making it effectively a 174-year lease, or in some cases, 198 years. They commenced by asking for the lease of Marine Lot No. 2 Extension to be for 999 years on the ground that they were going to build a dock on ML No. 2 & ML No. 2 Extension.

On this condition, Chamberlain agreed to their request. The Company accepted the condition but in Oct 1901 came again to say they were concerned with the Company promoting operations and the exact extent to which the public will apply for them. The mortgage securities of the new company were exceptional.

The firm had to show that they had discovered that ML No. 2 + Extension was maintainable for a dock and that they proposed to build there instead of on patent steps. They then asked for a lease of Marine Lot No. 3. We agreed that they might have the latter lot also on a 999-year lease.

In March 1902, the Company applied to the Governor to have Inland Lot No. 6 included on a 999-year lease, and this too was agreed to.

The next step was when the Company asked for a 999-year lease of land for a dock, suggesting that it would outlast the Company. The suggestion that to enable this, the Hongkong should throw away for nothing an asset worth many thousands of pounds when the present lease falls in, was met with the argument that only their success in the past could have led to such an application.

The past concessions were at least granted in order to see a large dock built. Now, they asked for the concession, which would bring no advantage at all, without compensating the public.

Page 3481

Page 38722;

35-233

GR18667/02

Drc'04

2924/04

Edit History

2026-06-07 18:34:35 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
granting such leases was undertaken. They granted a 99-year lease of Marine Lot No. 2 Extension. Leases of Marine Lot No. 3 were also granted for 99 years. This, however, did not satisfy the Governor, who contended that the ordinary rule of 75 years must apply with an option of one renewal for 99 years, making it effectively a 174-year lease, or in some cases, 198 years. They commenced by asking for the lease of Marine Lot No. 2 Extension to be for 999 years on the ground that they were going to build a dock on ML No. 2 & ML No. 2 Extension. On this condition, Chamberlain agreed to their request. The Company accepted the condition but in Oct 1901 came again to say they were concerned with the Company promoting operations and the exact extent to which the public will apply for them. The mortgage securities of the new company were exceptional. The firm had to show that they had discovered that ML No. 2 + Extension was maintainable for a dock and that they proposed to build there instead of on patent steps. They then asked for a lease of Marine Lot No. 3. We agreed that they might have the latter lot also on a 999-year lease. In March 1902, the Company applied to the Governor to have Inland Lot No. 6 included on a 999-year lease, and this too was agreed to. The next step was when the Company asked for a 999-year lease of land for a dock, suggesting that it would outlast the Company. The suggestion that to enable this, the Hongkong should throw away for nothing an asset worth many thousands of pounds when the present lease falls in, was met with the argument that only their success in the past could have led to such an application. The past concessions were at least granted in order to see a large dock built. Now, they asked for the concession, which would bring no advantage at all, without compensating the public. Page 3481 Page 38722; 35-233 GR18667/02 Drc'04 2924/04
Baseline (Original)
granting such leases Avas (aken. They WIH granted a 99 420 marine dot no 2 Extension leases of of Marine поз Lot no 3 also D 99 yrs lease of nserve voir get through tres Thi's however Eid not མ་ the Governor was 3481 that the Sofs conardend that the ordmary rule of 75 years must all with option of ful and Lot no b -ie mally one nnewal 198 yrs on how so they commenced by asking for the lease of marine hot no 2 Extension to be for 999 years the ground that Abuild they Tw going 38722; no a Sock on MLTO 2 & M L NO 2 Extension On this condition WChamberlain 3 agreed to their quest Qomo case. Quin The Co accepted. the condition but in Oct 1901 came again tosay apply. We an of concerned with the Company promoting operations the firm Oy the exact extent to which the public will apply for them the mortgage Sebruluns of Rear а 150 years lease Exceptional new company. 35-233 the firm to show that they had Siscovered MC 2 + Extension tobe maintable for a Sock - that they proposed buld ther to mstead 2 patent steps abbails the Sock Lotno 3 - 4 they Marine then fon aske 5 lease. We agreed. that they might have the latter lot also on 999 yrs In march 1902 the Co applied to the Governor to have duland Lot hob enslerad брада, что as will on a 999 years lease, & this too agrist. 1o. The next step was 18667 02 Drc'04 2924 04 when the ce asked for a 999 years lease of land for will Soubitess outlast the Company, & the suggestion that to enable a slightly bitter application list the Stong kong should throw away for nothing will probably asset which worth many Chousands br Soo Atten of pounds Whim the present lease falls in alourd that only their is So success in the past could have application led to such The past concessions wer at least granted in order seeth to large dock bring built now asked for the concession would bring to the host no advantage at all a.!, compensating H
2026-06-07 18:34:35 · Baseline
View content

granting

such leases

Avas

(aken.

They

WIH

granted a 99 420

marine dot no 2 Extension

leases

of

of

Marine

поз

Lot no 3 also

D

99 yrs

lease of

nserve

voir

get through

tres

Thi's however Eid not

མ་

the Governor was

3481

that the Sofs conardend that

the ordmary rule of 75 years must

all with option of

ful and Lot no b

-ie mally one nnewal

198 yrs

on how so they commenced by asking for the lease of marine hot no 2 Extension to be for 999 years

the ground that Abuild

they

Tw

going

38722;

no a Sock on MLTO 2 & M L NO 2 Extension

On this condition WChamberlain

3

agreed to their quest

Qomo

case.

Quin

The Co accepted. the condition

but in Oct 1901 came again

tosay

apply.

We an

of

concerned with

the Company promoting operations

the firm

Oy

the exact extent to

which the public will apply for

them the mortgage

Sebruluns

of

Rear

а

150

years

lease

Exceptional

new

company.

35-233

the firm

to show

that they had Siscovered

MC 2 + Extension tobe maintable for

a Sock - that they proposed

buld ther

to

mstead 2 patent steps

abbails the Sock

Lotno 3 - 4

they

Marine

then fon

aske 5

lease. We agreed.

that they might have the latter

lot also

on 999 yrs

In march 1902 the Co applied to

the Governor to have duland Lot hob

enslerad

брада, что

as will on a 999 years lease, & this too

agrist. 1o.

The next step

was

18667

02

Drc'04

2924

04

when the ce

asked for a 999

years lease of land for

will Soubitess outlast the Company,

& the suggestion that to enable

a

slightly bitter

application list the Stong kong

should throw away for nothing

will probably

asset which

worth

many

Chousands

br

Soo

Atten

of pounds

Whim the present lease falls in

alourd that only their

is

So

success

in

the past could have

application

led to such

The past concessions wer at least granted in order

seeth

to

large dock bring built

now asked for

the concession

would bring to the host no

advantage at all a.!,

compensating

H

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.